|Scholars opinions about analogy
|Page 1 of 1|
|Author:||Linguistic [ 17 Apr 2010, 05:02 ]|
|Post subject:||Scholars opinions about analogy|
Professor Ahmed Ibrahim wrote in his book علم أصول الفقه that analogy (القياس) can be used for deduction. However, he enumerates several conditions for a valid analogy,
Professor Ibrahim finishes with two very important observations. He says that the wisdom (الحكمة) of the rulings of God may not be obvious, so one should not try to guess it and build an analogy case on that. Instead, one should find the contingency (العلة) associated with the case compared to and when there is a case in question that shares the same contingency, then and only then can an analogy case be made. The ruling of the analogous case then becomes valid or invalid as the contingency is there or not there.
An example of this technique is breaking the fast in Ramadan. The wisdom allowing it is hardship, but hardship is hard to quantify. That's why the contingency of traveling or illness is used instead. Another example is handing over the orphan his money. The wisdom is his maturity, but that is hard to quantify, so puberty is used instead.
Finally, he emphasizes that all of the rulings of the Sharia are meant to benefit people or keep harm away from them. That objective should be alive in the minds of scholars as they use analogy in their deduction.
|Page 1 of 1||All times are UTC|
|Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group