TheMostReadBook.org

An English translation of the Quran that is as close as possible to the Arabic sacred text
View active topics
  Verse(s):    
View unanswered posts





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Did a hadeeth abrogate 65:6?
PostPosted: 21 Oct 2010, 16:14 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 04 May 2009, 16:10
Posts: 4558
Location: USA
Abdul-Muta`aal Al-Jabri, in his book لا نسخ في القرآن...لماذا؟, page 124, mentions that some have thought that

was abrogated by a hadeeth, narrated by Faatima bint Qays, in which she said, "The Messenger of God, peace be upon him, did not let me have residence nor alimony." Al-Jabri counters that the reason was that it was a punishment for her assault on her in-laws, as detailed in the two authentic books of Hadeeth. That explains it.

Faatima understood 65:6 to be about divorced women who may still be taken back, not those who have been divorced for the third and last time. She quoted for evidence,

And commented on the clause, "You do not know, maybe God will cause something afterward", saying, "What can happen after three divorces?"

However, according to Al-Jabri, Umar, Ibn Mas`ood, Abu-Haneefa, Ath-Thawri, many Sahaaba and second generation scholars, as well as Koofi jurists have ruled that divorced women get residence and alimony regardless of how many times they have been divorced by the same husband. Maalik ruled residence only for divorcées who may still be taken back but no alimony. If she is pregnant, however, he ruled residence and alimony until she delivers.

_________________
A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Who said what
PostPosted: 21 Oct 2010, 16:15 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 04 May 2009, 16:10
Posts: 4558
Location: USA
For:
Unnamed.

Against:
Umar, Ibn Mas`ood, Abu-Haneefa and Ath-Thawri (implied by their rulings),
Koofi jurists,
Ibn Salaama (who said that there are no abrogated verses in Chapter 65),
Al-Jabri.

_________________
A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did a hadeeth abrogate 65:6?
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2010, 07:37 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 05 May 2009, 00:16
Posts: 1839
Location: USA
65:6 is very explicit about the duties of a man towards his wife so it must be abrogated, right?

_________________
To translate is the best way to understand


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
It is currently 29 Mar 2024, 11:53

All times are UTC

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group