For: As-Suddi (he said the abrogating verse is 9:91), Ibn Abbaas (in some reports), Al-Hasan, Ikrima (according to An-Nahhaas or Makki), Mujaahid (according to Ibn Salaam), `Ataa' Al-Khuraasaani (he said the abrogating is 9:122, per Ar-Raazi), Ibn Zayd (who said the abrogating is 9:122, according to An-Nahhaas as reported by Dr. Faaris), Murra ibn Shuraaheel (according to Shu`la), Al-Qaasim ibn Salaam, Ibn Hazm Al-Andalusi, Ibn Salaama.
Against: The majority, according to Al-Khazraji, Ibn Abbaas (in other reports, according to Dr. Zayd), Ad-Dhahhaak (implied), Qataada (re 9:122, according to Shu`la), Abu-Sulaymaan Ad-Dimashqi, Ibn Khuwayz Mindaad, An-Nahhaas, Makki, Al-Qurtubi, Ibn Al-Jawzi, Judge Abu-Ya`la (implied, according to Dr. Zayd), Abu-Abdillah Shu`la, Ar-Raazi, Ash-Shawkaani, Abdullah ibn Al-Husayn (who said it was the other way around: 9:41 abrogated 9:122, according to Dr. Al-Husayni), Al-Khazraji, Shah Waliullah Dehlvi, Muhammad Al-Khudhari (Bek), Al-Jabri, Dr. Mustafa Zayd, Ali Hasan Al-Areedh, Dr. Ahmad Hijaazi As-Saqqa, M. M. Nada, Dr. Az-Zalmi, Dr. Muhammad Saalih Ali Mustafa, Jamaal `Ataaya.
_________________ A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle.
|