TheMostReadBook.org

Ibn Al-Jawzi reports that

was claimed abrogated by


He dismisses the claim quickly since both verses are statements of fact. He writes,


This is the second time I read Ibn Al-Jawzi putting down an opinion of Muqaatil ibn Sulaymaan.

Among the scholars who rejected this claim was Abu-Abdillah Shu`la, in his book صفوة الراسخ في علم المنسوخ والناسخ, as reported by Dr. M. Ibrahim Faaris in his presentation book, page 73. His argument is that both verses are statements of fact.

For:
Ibn Abbaas, according to Al-Khazraji,
Muqaatil ibn Sulaymaan,
Juwaybir ibn Sa`eed Al-Azdi (according to Shu`la),
Ibn Hazm Al-Andalusi,
An-Nahhaas (in one report),
Ibn Salaama,
Ibn Al-Baarizi.

Against:
Ibn Al-Jawzi,
An-Nahhaas (in another report, quoted by Dr. Zayd, in which he unambiguously stated that 11:15 could not possibly have been abrogated),
Makki,
Ar-Raazi, Al-Aloosi (according to Az-Zalmi),
Abu-Abdillah Shu`la,
Dr. Mustafa Zayd,
Dr. Az-Zalmi,
Dr. M. Ibrahim Faaris.