For: Sa`eed ibn Al-Musayyib, Ibn Umar, Saalim, Jaabir ibn Zayd, `Ataa', Taawoos, Maalik ibn Anas, Abu-Haneefa and his fellows (according to Dr. Zayd), Ibn Amr (implied, according to Nada), Ash-Shaafi`i, Al-Jabaa'i (who said the abrogating is consensus!, according to `Ataaya), Abdul-Qaahir Al-Baghdaadi (who said the abrogating is consensus!, according to Dr. Zayd), At-Tabari (quoted by Dr. Zayd), Ibn Hazm Al-Andalusi, Abul-`Abbaas Al-Hasani (implied, per Aş-Şa`di), Ibn Salaama, Ibn Al-Baarizi, An-Nahhaas, As-Suyooti.
Against: Ali ibn Abi-Taalib (by his ruling in an adultery case, per Dr. Al-Husayni), Abu-Bakr and Umar (by their rulings, per Haani Taahir), Ibn Mas`ood and Jaabir ibn Abdillah (implied by their allowance of marrying the woman one has fornicated with), Ibn Abbaas, Ikrima, Mujaahid, Sa`eed ibn Jabeer, `Urwa ibn Az-Zubayr, Ad-Dhahhaak, Mak-hool, Muqaatil ibn Hayyaan, Ibn `Umar, Saalim, Jaabir ibn Zayd, `Ataa', Taawoos, Maalik ibn Anas, Al-Hasan (implied), Mujaahid, Ash-Sha`bi, Ibrahim An-Nakh`i, Qataada, Muqaatil (according to Haani Taahir citing Ibn Katheer exegesis), Abu-Haneefa and his fellows, Ibn Al`Arabi, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ibn Qudaama (who, like Ibn Hanbal, ruled that marriage to an adulteress is invalid until she repents), Hanash ibn Al-Mu`tamir, Al-Asfahaani, Ibn Katheer, Ash-Shawkaani, Ar-Raazi, Ibn Al-Qayyim (quoted by Nada), Az-Zamakhshari (according to Dr. Zayd), Shihaab-ud-Deen Al-Aloosi, Jamaal-ud-Deen Al-Qaasimi, Abul-A`la Al-Mawdoodi and Sayyid Qutb (implied), all quoted by Haani Taahir, Aş-Şa`di, Abdullah ibn Al-Husayn, Al-Masoor Billah and Ahmad ibn Ibrahim ibn Al-Hasan aka Al-Haadi (according to Aş-Şa`di), Shah Waluillah Dehlvi, Muhammad Al-Khudhari (Bek), Ali-Hasan Al-Areedh, Dr. Mustafa Zayd, Mahmood Shaltoot (implied, quoted by Nada), M. M. Nada, Dr. Az-Zalmi, Dr. Muhammad Saalih Ali Mustafa, Haani Taahir, Husaam Al-Ghaali, Ihab Hasan Abduh, Jamaal `Ataaya.
_________________ A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle.
|