|
Topics |
Author |
Replies |
Views |
Last post |
Announcements |
|
Bookmarks
|
Linguistic |
0 |
3291 |
15 Aug 2010, 22:27
Linguistic
|
|
About the Abrogation Forum
|
Linguistic |
0 |
1946 |
04 Feb 2010, 04:50
Linguistic
|
|
Rules and etiquette - Please read before posting
|
Linguistic |
0 |
45787 |
28 Jun 2009, 16:46
Linguistic
|
Topics |
|
Did the regular prayers mandate abrogate 52:48?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
2117 |
05 Sep 2010, 21:28
Pragmatic
|
|
Did 37:107 abrogate 37:102?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1473 |
01 Sep 2010, 23:14
Pragmatic
|
|
Did 33:51 abrogate 33:52 or the other way around?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
1999 |
01 Sep 2010, 23:13
Pragmatic
|
|
Did a hadeeth abrogate 31:14?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
1631 |
01 Sep 2010, 23:07
Pragmatic
|
|
Did 76:30 or 81:29 abrogate 76:29, 73:19, 80:12 and 81:28?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
2078 |
28 Aug 2010, 22:29
Linguistic
|
|
Did 17:79 abrogate 76:26?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1410 |
28 Aug 2010, 22:22
Linguistic
|
|
Did 23:96 or 41:34 abrogate 42:42?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1460 |
25 Aug 2010, 14:43
Linguistic
|
|
Did analysis abrogate 38:44?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1561 |
23 Aug 2010, 23:34
Linguistic
|
|
Did 26:227 abrogate 26:224?
|
Linguistic |
4 |
3243 |
22 Aug 2010, 14:59
Linguistic
|
|
Did 24:60 abrogate 24:31 or did it abrogate itself?
|
Linguistic |
3 |
3077 |
22 Aug 2010, 01:53
Linguistic
|
|
Did 47:4 abrogate 9:5 or the other way around?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1494 |
21 Aug 2010, 15:06
Linguistic
|
|
Did 22:39 abrogate 39:3?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
1806 |
21 Aug 2010, 14:46
Linguistic
|
|
Did 24:7 abrogate 24:4?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1509 |
21 Aug 2010, 13:45
Linguistic
|
|
Did 24:6 abrogate 24:4?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
1833 |
21 Aug 2010, 13:33
Linguistic
|
|
Did 4:25 abrogate 24:2?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1513 |
21 Aug 2010, 12:48
Linguistic
|
|
Did a hadeeth abrogate 19:26?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1565 |
19 Aug 2010, 13:06
Linguistic
|
|
Did 5:89 abrogate 16:91?
|
Linguistic |
4 |
2884 |
19 Aug 2010, 06:56
Pragmatic
|
|
Did 83:1 abrogate 17:35?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
2002 |
19 Aug 2010, 05:48
Pragmatic
|
|
Did 16:110 abrogate 16:106 or did it abrogate itself?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
2004 |
19 Aug 2010, 05:44
Pragmatic
|
|
Did 3:77 abrogate 17:34?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1537 |
18 Aug 2010, 19:51
Linguistic
|
|
Did 2:220 abrogate 17:34?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
1647 |
18 Aug 2010, 19:41
Linguistic
|
|
Did 16:18 abrogate 14:34?
|
Linguistic |
1 |
1349 |
18 Aug 2010, 13:38
Linguistic
|
|
Did 9:99 abrogate 9:97-98?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
1734 |
18 Aug 2010, 05:39
Pragmatic
|
|
Did 9:29 abrogate 9:5?
|
Linguistic |
3 |
2578 |
18 Aug 2010, 04:06
Linguistic
|
|
Did 2:220 abrogate 6:152?
|
Linguistic |
2 |
2528 |
17 Aug 2010, 21:51
Pragmatic
|
|